Driving By the Church
January 31, 2008 at 10:41 pm | In Catherine Foote | 5 CommentsI am an avid fan of public radio. Anyone who has listened to very many of my sermons probably knows that because I often find myself saying, “I was listening to NPR the other day and I heard . . .” (And by the way I am a member of one of our local stations, KUOW. In the NPR world “membership” means I send them some money once a year, and I get a little thank you gift. Mine is little because of the level at which I pledge. But I do pledge, so I am a member. In the church, membership means something more. If you want to know what the “something more” is, check out the article in the January 20th 2008 edition of our church newsletter called Church and Home, which you can find on line at our website. Still, it is budget time at our church, and pledging is a part of membership here, so if you have not yet pledged, why not take a minute to do it now? You can also pledge on line at our website-Universityucc.org. Now back to my regularly scheduled blog.)
So Monday morning while the snow fell outside I found myself listening to the morning talk show on KUOW. And Steve Sher’s guest, Shelby Steele, was talking about Senator Barack Obama. At one point he attacked Obama’s church, saying it was a “black nationalist, afro-centric church . . . that his (Obama’s) own mother would never be comfortable in.” Sher then asked Steele if he had visited the church, which by the way is Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. (Trinity, in fact, is our largest UCC congregation, with a wonderful history and a generous record of support for the denomination. If you have read Obama’s book, Dreams of My Father, you will know something about how Obama connected with that church and found a faith there that he could embrace.) Anyway, Sher asked Steele if he had ever visited the church, and Steele replied, “I drove past it a couple of weeks ago.”
You might imagine that at this point I am jumping up and down and sputtering at the radio. You drove past it???!!! I can think of so many different responses to this statement, ranging from the very specific response to Steele, that you can’t really know much at all about a church by “driving by” it, all the way to the broad general observation about how many people do judge a church in their drive-by, to the question, “What do folks think when they drive by our church?” But let me stick to my initial and very specific response to Steele’s statement.
And that very specific response was to say, “How do you know where Obama’s mother would be comfortable? She has raised an articulate, thoughtful son who found in the United Church of Christ a faith that could engage his imagination, his compassion and his dedication to doing something good. This is what I know about Trinity Church. They are a multicultural, multiethnic congregation. They are a congregation that leads in giving to the wider denomination. They are an extravagantly welcoming church, with a heart for ministries of justice in the world. They are a congregation which some in my own church have visited, and where I imagine many in my church would find a home if they moved to Chicago. I think Ann Dunham (Senator Obama’s mother), were she alive today, would be quite comfortable at her son’s church.”
I didn’t call in to the show- I knew I would want to go on and on and they wouldn’t let me- but I do invite each of us to this interesting conversation, with all the associated questions about driving by a church and deciding you know what’s inside, about who might be comfortable where, about how a church can get attacked for speaking out for justice, about why politics seems so often to get ugly, and about how we here in Seattle live out our own sense of welcome.
By the way, for more information about Trinity United Church of Christ, and about some of the things being said about that church during the current presidential campaign, go to www.ucc.org/news/thomas-denounces-smear-1.html.
Welcome to the Blog
January 22, 2008 at 5:36 pm | In Uncategorized | 11 CommentsHi there especially to you who have come to the blog the old school way- because of the invitation in the Church and Home newsletter. I’m glad you made it. While you’re here, look around a little. Read some of the other blogs. I actuially posted another one a few minutes ago. And then leave a note, just to let me know you dropped by. You can simply say hi, or you can comment on one of the other posts; you can tell us something you like about our church, or you can tell a joke. My aim is to see how many responses we can get to this post. I look forward to hearing from you.
Peace,
Catherine
PS- If you can’t fingure out how to post a comment. don’t worry. I had trouble the first few times too. Just email me at cfoote@universityucc.org and I’ll try to help.
CF
Are You a Values Voter?
January 22, 2008 at 5:32 pm | In Catherine Foote, Uncategorized | 3 CommentsI was listening to a recording of Martin Luther King’s 1967 speech at the Riverside Church today, as part of my MLK day observance. The speech, called something like “Beyond Vietnam,” was articulate, poetic and powerful. In addition to all of his other brilliant insights, he said that the United States needed a “values revolution.” Then he listed some of the values that he was calling our nation to embrace: ecumenism (the world is too small for religious divisiveness), a prizing of people over things (attacking the rampant materialism and greed of his time- which by the way looks rather tame in light of this century’s materialism and greed), and a deep commitment to non-violence as a way of life were just a few of the values that King invited us to embrace.
I found his call ironic in light of the way the term “values” has been co-opted by right wing conservatives in the last several years. The first time I remember hearing the phrase “Values Voter” was in the 2004 presidential election. It seemed as if every news reporter was saying it. “The ‘values voter’ might make the difference.” It was usually made along with the observation that conservative Christians would turn out in record numbers to vote “in defense of marriage” (translate: “against expanding marriage benefits to gay couples”). In fact the phrase was used so often that the day after the country re-elected President Bush, I put a home-made bumper sticker on my truck. “I voted my values” I said, and put the phrase on a rainbow background. This was my way of saying there are other values than being against offering the protection and benefits of civil union to certain committed couples, or limiting the options of pregnant women, or supporting an illegal war.
Eventually the rain washed my homemade bumper sticker off my truck and use of the phrase of the values voter seemed to die down. But now I am hearing it again. I noticed it about a month ago, when folks were gearing up for the beginning of the primary campaign. And I heard it again a few weeks ago when Larry Stickney, executive director of the Family Policy Institute (affiliated with Focus on the Family, where James Dobson commented on vitality of Value Voters the day after the Iowa caucuses) was a guest on KUOW. I actually called the radio that day to object to the appropriation of the term.
The phrase values voter is such a discouragingly long way from the values revolution that King called for. And the use of the phrase as a shorthand for a certain narrow, anti-gay, anti-choice voting pattern seems to me a real disservice to the word and to those of us who live out our deeply held, positive and affirming values every day.
So I intend to redeem and reclaim the phrase. I have developed another bumper sticker for this year’s campaigns. It reads:
Values Voter
Peace Justice Diversity
Compassion Sustainability Love
It actually looks a little neater than that- but I can’t figure out how to adjust the font on this blog. Anyway, I’m putting it on my truck. Because I’m a values voter too.
Facing Fears in the New Year
January 9, 2008 at 1:56 am | In Catherine Foote, Uncategorized | 4 CommentsTo begin my year, I went to a one-day retreat at the Whidbey Institute, just a mile and a half from my home. (If you have never been to the Institute, let me take a moment to recommend it before I continue my reflection. So this is an aside, indicated by the presence of parentheses. (Just a note: I don’t always indicate my asides with parentheses. Sometimes I just ramble on about one thing right in the middle of making a point about something else.) Anyway, the Whidbey Institute is a retreat and study community of about 70 acres on the south end of Whidbey Island. They call themselves a “thin place”- that is, a place where the veil between this world and “the other world” is particularly thin, and so one can access deeper truths of the soul simply by being physically present on the land. (or something like that.) (There is a labyrinth at the Institute that I like to walk when I want to specifically focus my attention and intention. I walked it at the beginning of my sabbatical. I also walked it at the retreat about which I am currently writing. (Iona, in Scotland, where I went last summer with folks from this church also calls itself a thin place. (There is also a labyrinth there.))))
The focus of the retreat was “Letting Go of Fear,” and although I went more for the opportunity to reflect on the coming year than for the topic, I was nevertheless intrigued. And most especially I was drawn in to the question with which the retreat leader introduced the retreat. “What would you do if you were not afraid?” She invited the fourteen or so of us gathered there in the chapel (a stunningly beautiful building constructed completely from timber taken from the Institute land) (Go there just to see that chapel if for nothing else) to spend the day with this question. She also read some quotes about fear. The one most interesting to me was the proverb, “Once you’ve been been bitten by a snake you are afraid of every rope.”
By the end of the day I did not really have an answer to the retreat question, but I did feel very energized by the experience of spending the day at the Institute. Following our closing session in the chapel, it was getting dark. The leader told us to be careful, as there was a tree across the path we had to take to get back to our cars- it was a small tree that had been blown down in the last storm and had not yet been cleaned up. “I’ve been worrying about that tree all day,” the leader said, “since I knew we would be leaving here in the dark.”
Hmmm. Since the leader had also mentioned the tree in the morning and since I had a pruning saw in my truck (left over from Christmas tree work) I had actually spent some of my free time that day removing the tree from the path.
Some of the other participants said, “The tree is gone- someone moved it.”
“I did,” I said quietly. The retreat leader laughed and then turned and gave me a hug.
I guess once you’ve tripped over something, you see trees in the path even when they’re gone.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.